Independent Bloggers’ Alliance mirror site

March 4, 2007

I set up the Independent Bloggers’ Alliance site at WordPress for a reason. I’m sure I did. At the moment, though, I can’t remember exactly what that reason was. At least some of it had to do with the ease of using tags, so that, if the site got big

I mention this now, because I am becoming more aware of some of the limitations inherent in WordPress–the most relevant being that *most* people use Blogger/Blogspot, and I think that’s put an unnecessary stumbling block in the way of adding new contributors.

I don’t know, ultimately, what the solution will be, but yesterday I spent some time creating a mirror site on Blogspot. Okay, that’s when I discovered *one* of the reasons for using WordPress–adding the site banner was a lot easier there.

But here’s the deal…if you’d like to be a contributor to the Independent Bloggers’ Alliance, and Blogger/Blogspot would be easier or more convenient for you, drop me an e-mail at ohiorenee(at)gmail.com and I can send you an invite. WordPress has a function where I can import posts from another blog, so your posts will appear here even if you aren’t signed up at WordPress.


The United States of Creationism

March 4, 2007

CLICK IMAGE FOR MORE

Tags: Creationism, Intelligent Design, Global Warming, science, research, cartoon, political cartoon, comics, satire


Learning not to bite

March 4, 2007

Earlier this afternoon I read an essay by field negro at My Left Wing. He was reflecting after attending the viewing of a dear friend’s father, and at the end of the post, he writes:

It was so weird being in that packed room with all those people and family members coming to pay their respects. Respects to a man who had stayed with his wife, raised his family, and kept his roots in his community and contributed to the well being of his city. This is one reason I suspect that he disliked my people, because he thought that we were the very antithesis of what he represented. But if the poor guy had taken the time to try, he would have seen that there are many black grandfathers all over the city who are just like him. Who, if he had reached out like his son had, probably would have been able to change his thinking and his heart.

So I spent some time turning this over in my head. I was already thinking about race after having watched the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright talk about the theology of Black liberation. And that led to thinking about empathy, perspective, and why we humans are so intent on being crappy to each other.

I was also thinking about the eye for an eye verse from the Bible, and how it means only one eye for one eye.

Throughout the world today, and throughout the long history of humanity, the dominant tradition has never been one of trying to fit the punishment to the crime, much less has it involved the notion of rehabilitating the offender. The dominant approach has always been one of allowing the officials to exercise their unlimited desire for vengeance and retribution.

Justice was conducted on the basis of blood feuds. Retribution knew no limits. Typical of this ancient mentality was the speech of Lamech who boasted to his many wives: “I have slain a man for wounding me, a young man for striking me. If Cain was avenged 7-fold, then I am avenged 77-fold!” [Gen. 4:23f.]

We do have a tendency to go overboard, don’t we? But why do we hate, and why do choose to do things that are hurtful, either physically or emotionally?

I’m sure there are a number of answers, but at least in part, hate usually comes from fear and ignorance. And we hurt people (whether with fists, words, or weapons) when we are hurting–or when we are anticipating being hurt. But another part of it is that we lack empathy. Or, conversely, we often find it easier to behave humanely toward one another, and insist on justice for others, when we are capable of feeling each other’s pain.

Which brings me to the title of this post, “Learning not to bite”. While I was thinking of all the things I mentioned above, I thought to myself, “What would it be like if we could arrange it so that every time someone said something hurtful to someone else, they would automatically feel the pain they caused?”

And that reminded me of something I read in parenting books and advice columns when our kids were little. Someone would ask, “I’ve been told that, when my toddler bites me, I should bite him/her back to show what it feels like–is that a good idea?” The answer, of course, is no, but one specific suggestion I recall is this…as the little one prepares to chomp, do a little sleight of hand that results in the child biting his or her own arm. This would cause the child in a very literal way to “feel someone else’s pain”. Of course, at that pre-verbal stage, I’m sure they aren’t thinking that way. It’s probably more like, “It hurts when I do this–so I won’t do it any more.”

As we get older, though, we become more capable of reflecting on what someone else might be feeling. That doesn’t mean we always do. But we’re can, if we’re intentional about it. And field negro’s post reminded me of one of my own “Aha!” moments, when he mentioned being the only Black person at the viewing. I thought back to one of the first times I rode the bus with Demetrius to the south side of Chicago to visit his Mom. At some point, I realized that I was the only White person on the bus, and that was an odd, uncomfortable feeling for me. I’d never been in a situation like that before, where I was the only one “of my kind”.  And I’ve only had a handful of similar experiences since then.

Much more often, Demetrius will be the only Black person when we go somewhere. The only time I remember us specifically noticing and remarking about it out loud was when we attended a Monkees reunion concert, and it was a rather amusing realization at the time. But at other moments, I’ve wondered what that would be like spending much of my life in situations where I am the exception rather than the norm. And I realize that those of us who are in the majority tend to take it for granted that “that’s the way it’s supposed to be”.


Kanye West got it wrong!

March 3, 2007

George Bush does too care about Black people.

Via Yahoo News Photos

Come on–what more proof do people need?

But, wait a second…who is he talking to on that phone? I think we need some captions.


A Black Theology of Liberation

March 3, 2007

Via Crooks and Liars:

Obama’s Pastor, Rev. Dr. Jeremiah Wright, goes on Hannity & Colmes to slap down Hannity’s implied slur of Trinity United Church of Christ’s doctrine. When was the last time you saw Hannity not be able to get a word in edgewise?

Hannity kept trying to nail Dr. Wright about how talk of a Black Value System sounds separatist. Wright informed him that the church grew out of the Liberation Theology movement. Every time Hannity tried to press him about how it doesn’t sound nice to say Black instead of all of us together, Wright asked Hannity what he knows about Liberation Theology, and how many of Cone’s books he has read. Hannity kept saying that he went to seminary, but Wright pressed him, saying “That’s not what I asked you.” So Hannity accused him of being “angry” and getting upset.

By the way, you know what “angry” means in this context, right? It means you’re insisting on stating your case rather than “assuming the position”.

Anyway, I haven’t read any of them either, but, unlike Hannity, I’m actually curious about such things. So here’s one of the many books Sean Hannity has *not* read…

A Black Theology of Liberation by James H. Cone

There’s also a summary of the ideas espoused by Trinity United Church of Christ here.


Saturday Morning Political Cartoon

March 3, 2007

See it here first, a preview of today’s “Saturday Morning Political Cartoon.” It’s a regular Daily Kos feature, or at least a few of us cartoonits want it to be, if we can get some support. Posted every Saturday between 9 and 10 am. Today, I will try to post at 10.

Today’s cartoon is a rerun from October of ‘05, because I love it when I’m right. The ‘toon disappeared off the radar screen back then, but the Libby trial just might make it relevant again.

Read the rest of this entry »


Why is the I-Conn giving the Dem radio address?

March 3, 2007

TeddySanFran’s blog entry at Give ‘Em Hell, Harry:

Lieberman to Give Democrats’ Radio Response: WHY??

Good question. If you’re signed up at that blog, you can add your $.02 here.


Misheard lyrics

March 3, 2007

At Firedoglake, Christy Hardin Smith has a post up entitled Asparagus…In My My Cereal Bowl about funny misheard lyrics. Go check out some of the words people thought they heard–some of them had us laughing out loud. I mentioned in the comments that I had the book ‘Scuse Me While I Kiss This Guy (and yes, that’s what I thought Hendrix was singing!) and that the pictures are hilarious. Just had to share a couple of my favorites.

I built this garden for us by Lenny Kravitz, misheard as “I built this goddamn forest”.

This is the best shot I was able to get with my cell phone camera, but the look on Smoky the Bear’s face is priceless. ;)

And then there’s “However do you want me, however do you need me from Soul II Soul’s “Back to Life” misheard as, “I wanna be a wombat, I wanna be anemic.”

Finally, here’s a misheard lyrics video…


Some thoughts on classical conditioning

March 2, 2007

 Crossposted at My Left Wing and Booman Tribune

I’ve been meaning to do a post springboarding off of Maryscott’s essay about the response to last year’s Post article, but other things keep getting in the way. I have these little flashes of insight about what I want to say, and I jot them down so I don’t forget them. My purse now contains quite a collection of scraps of paper, covered with potential nuggets of “wisdom”. Readable to no one but me, sadly, and by the end of the day, I just never have the energy or focus to sit down and synthesize them into what I want to say.

But this morning, I woke up with this one thought I wanted to get across, and decided to go for it. Then my computer started giving me unhappy warning boxes about one thing or another, which sucked up precious minutes. I have way less time than I thought. But I’m going to write this thing, dammit. I just want to get this one idea across, and can revisit it later in depth.

Classical conditioning.

It is used in advertising all the time–pair a product with something that already gives you a good feeling, and hopefully the viewer will learn to associate that feeling with your product. Let’s say you are selling film, and your ad is going to show the vibrant, realistic colors your brand of film can capture. You might show, say, golden retriever puppies playing on a lush green lawn. That would certainly be a good way of demonstrating vivid colors, right? (The following is a lab and not a golden retriever, but it’s a picture I’ve got, and I bet it will make many of you smile…)

There are, of course, many other possible images that could be used to make the point, “our film captures vivid, realistic colors”. For example, say, live, up-close shots of open-heart surgery. What? You say that wouldn’t give you a happy feeling? Me neither. So I’m not going to show you a picture of that.

The point, though, is that the people who make commercials make these decisions all the time–which images, music, lighting, etc. will create the desired positive emotion. Or, in some cases, negative emotion. You might want to evoke negative emotions if you are showing another company’s product. Or a rival candidate. We see that all the time in political ads–using tone of voice, dark music, unflattering lighting, etc. to create negative emotional responses towards a certain candidate. Unfortunately, this doesn’t happen only in political ads, but in contexts that are actually supposed to provide “news”.

My dad is a lifelong conservative, and is always going to be against the candidates I like. On the issues, that’s a given. But I think his strong, visceral distaste for Howard Dean went beyond the issues. I became aware of this one day when he was going on about Howard’s angry face, and the way he yells and shakes his fist. And I realized that he gets his “news” almost exclusively from sources that reinforce that perception. They do this intentionally, of course.

One of Dad’s most frequently visited web sites is Drudge. He is always incredulous that Demetrius and I don’t like that site. He claims that it’s just a clearinghouse of links to different articles. Sure. But it’s also a propaganda tool. If there’s a headline about Howard Dean, one of those “angry” pictures will accompany it. You certainly won’t see a picture like the one I’ve got in my banner here. No, that wouldn’t achieve the desired purpose. Another example of this kind of intentional use of pictures to evoke or reinforce a negative response is when right wing bloggers discuss Rachel Corrie. Of course they don’t use the image you see on her memorial site. They use, instead, a very unflattering angry-looking photo. As if that should make people feel less compassion for her–less outrage over the manner in which she died.

So, back to the article about Maryscott O’Connor, which appeared in the Washington Post. I find it patently absurd that so much criticism was directed at Maryscott for the way she “allowed herself to be portrayed”. In particular, the unflattering picture that was chosen to accompany the piece. Why not direct the same amount of energy toward calling the media to task every time we see them trying to reinforce those “angry left” stereotypes?


A word of hope from Bishop Gene

March 1, 2007

In the past week or so, I’ve been watching for any word from Bishop Gene Robinson in response to the communique that came our of the recent meeting of the Anglican primates in Tanzania. This evening, I learned that he has written this in response to a plea he received for a “word of hope”…

Let’s remember that, for now, nothing has changed. The Episcopal Church has been bold in its inclusion of us, “risking its life” for us in dramatic ways over these last few years. Not perfect, but bold. Just because The Episcopal Church has been invited to subvert its own polity and become a Church ruled by bishops-only, a Church that is willing to sacrifice the lives and ministries and dignity of its gay and lesbian members on the altar of unity, does not mean that we are going to choose to do it. That is yet to be determined. Let’s not abandon hope simply because that is possible. The Primates have the right to make requests of us (nevermind the threatening tone of those requests). We do not have to accede to those requests in exactly the terms in which they are made.

Nothing is surprising in this development. None of us thought this issue was settled, did we? None of us expected our detractors to stop their efforts – whether their goals be genuinely about the authority of scripture and its playing out in our lives as Christians, or whether those goals have more to do with power and money and influence. (BOTH are represented in the actions taken.) We are fighting a larger battle here. As you have heard me say before, we are engaged in the beginning of the end of patriarchy. Did any of us believe that such a battle would be won without resistance? Did any of us believe there would be no more bumps in the road? Did any of us foresee smooth sailing into the future?

We still have countless allies. We are not engaged in this struggle alone. There are countless heterosexual members of this Church who now “get it.” They have heard our stories, felt our pain and taken up our cause as their own. There are countless heterosexual families who have joined The Episcopal Church (they are numerous in my own diocese) because they want to raise their children in such an inclusive Church. There are countless lgbt people who have come to our churches for the comfort and solace and grounding in Christ that we offer – and we dare not lose hope or momentum for them as well as ourselves.

Read the rest here. I don’t really have any thoughts of my own to add, but am happy to hear from Bishop Gene. As I was searching for a word *from* him, Google searches yielded more than a few words written *about* him. I admire his strength and am thankful that he has the strong faith needed to carry him through times like these.

Also, click here for a transcript of Bishop Katharine’s podcast this morning, and here for additional thoughts from Bishop Gene.

And I just gotta add, there is something about seeing that man’s smile that just makes me feel a little better about the world. Thank you for that, +Gene.

Hat tip to An Inch at a Time for the picture.
Click here to read the sermon Bishop Gene Robinson gave  in Columbus this past summer.